The Wedding of Queen Mary I and King Philip II of Spain

The wedding of Queen Mary I and King Philip II of Spain took place on July 25, 1554. It was the feast day of St. James the Greater, the patron saint of Spain. The venue chosen for the event was Winchester Cathedral, seventy miles outside of London where the Wyatt Rebellion had just been quelled and summer epidemics threatened. Even though it was pouring rain, the wedding was a grand affair. The preparations for the wedding were based on those of Mary’s mother Catherine of Aragon to Prince Arthur Tudor.

So that everyone could see the proceedings, a wooden walkway was constructed and covered with carpets extending from the west door of the cathedral to the front of the choir. The walkway was four feet high and ended in a dais upholstered in purple and about four feet square which overlaid the entire central nave adjoining the choir screen. The platform had an octagonal railed dais where the actual ceremony was to take place. The walls of the cathedral were draped with flags, carpets and standards.

Philip arrived about mid-morning accompanied by his English and Spanish attendants who were wearing their most splendid attire. Philip himself was dressed in the French style to match Mary’s clothes. He wore a bejeweled white doublet and breeches with a decorative golden mantle given to him by Mary. It was made of cloth of gold trimmed in crimson velvet and lined with crimson satin. The mantle was trimmed with thistles of curled gold and each of the twenty-four buttons on the sleeves were crafted from four large pearls. To complete his costume, he wore the ceremonial collar of the order of the Garter which Mary had sent to him earlier.

Philip walked down the nave on the raised platform until he reached the dais. He went to the far end of it and down some steps to the left where there was a canopy prepared for him and he sat down in a chair in front of the rood loft. As he awaited the Queen, he was accompanied by the foreign ambassadors who were seated in order of precedence. They included his father the Emperor’s ambassador, that of the King of the Romans, those of Bohemia, Venice and Florence as well as some English and Spanish knights. The French ambassador did not appear.

In the center, there was a table in front of the screen and to the right was another canopy and chair for Mary. This chair, where Mary actually sat, is still preserved in the cathedral. The position of the Queen’s chair clearly indicated Mary’s superior position as the reigning monarch of England. Mary entered the cathedral through the west door at about 11:30 am accompanied by the leading noblewomen of the kingdom. One chronicler noted she was ‘richly dressed and adorned with jewels’ which is completely within her character. Her train was carried by the marchioness of Winchester assisted by the lord chamberlain Sir John Gage.

The dress was described as in the French style made of rich delicate cloth (tissue) with a wide border and sleeves embroidered on purple satin and set with pearls and lined with purple taffeta. She had on a fashionable short-sleeved jacket known as a partlet which just covered the chest along with a high collar and a white satin kirtle. Once her presence was known, Philip was alerted. Mary took her place under the canopy beside the dais and began to pray.

Stephen Gardiner, Bishop of Winchester, along with five other bishops in full pontificals, made their way from the choir and climbed up five steps to the railed dais on the platform. They all stood in the center with Gardiner, as the diocesan bishop and also Lord Chancellor of England, positioned in the most prominent place.

Mary and Philip rose and greeted the bishops. They were joined by the foreign ambassadors, the earls of Bedford and Lord Fitzwalter, and the lord great chamberlain, the earl of Oxford. It was at this time in the ceremony that Don Juan de Figueroa, a doctor of law and councilor of Charles V, as well as regent of the chancery of the kingdom of Naples, walked forward to present Philip with letters patent. In these letters, Philip’s father bestowed upon him the title and full rights of King of Naples.

Gardiner read the letters in Latin and then gave a short explanation in English for the benefit of the audience. This new rank entitled Philip to a sword of state to match Mary’s as Queen of England and there was a brief delay in the ceremony until one was found. Gardiner announced it was time for the couple to be married in person according to the terms of the articles that had been approved by the Emperor, Philip and Mary. The bishop then displayed the marriage treaty in its Latin form, giving a short commentary in English.

The bishop made it clear the treaty had been approved by Parliament, stressing that the realm of Spain had also given consent to the terms. He then began the marriage ceremony by first asking if anyone knew of any impediment to the marriage, either due to kinship or a preceding claim. There was a pause and then the audience answered there was none. Next, Gardiner read the papal dispensation from Julius III which allowed these two cousins to marry. The wedding service was then conducted in both Latin and English.

Gardiner asked who would give the Queen away and four peers came to the fore. The marquis of Winchester and the earls of Derby, Bedford and Pembroke acted on behalf of the whole kingdom as Mary had no close male relatives. The congregation cried out their support for their Queen and the vows were then exchanged in the two languages. Philip then placed a plain gold band and three handfuls of gold coins on the bishop’s bible. The bishop blessed them. Mary’s main attendant, Lady Margaret Clifford, daughter of the earl of Cumberland and a close relative of the Queen, came forward with the queen’s purse and Mary placed the gold in it. Mary and Philip then kissed.

During the kiss, the earl of Oxford held the Queen’s hand and then the earl of Pembroke, bearing a sword, stepped to stand before the new King of England. As trumpets sounded, the newlywed couple and all those who had been on the dais followed the bishops into the choir. They all took their places under canopies at either side of the High Altar and High Mass was celebrated by Gardiner and two other bishops. The other three acted as servers.

The time came for the exchange of the peace. Philip rose and crossed over to the Queen and gave her the kiss of peace. The communion was finished and the Garter King of Arms went to the foot of the High Altar along with some heralds and proclaimed the style of the King and Queen, giving their titles combined in an alternating manner. This style had been adopted in 1475 by Mary’s grandparents and Philip’s great-grandparents, Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain. “Philip and Mary, by the grace of God King and Queen of England, Naples, Jerusalem, Ireland and France, Archdukes of Austria, Dukes of Milan, Burgundy and Brabant, Counts of Habsburg, Flanders and Tyrol…..”

The Queen and her lay company received biscuits and spiced wine (hippocras). A canopy, held by the leading peers of England, was brought to the foot of the altar and Mary and Philip processed under it hand in hand down the nave, out of the Cathedral and into the east hall of Wolvesey castle where the wedding banquet was set up. On one end of the hall, a raised platform had been erected and after going up several steps, Mary and Philip sat at the royal table, along with Bishop Gardiner who sat a little away from the king and queen. They were seated under a canopy of state with Mary placed in the prominent position on the right with a chair that was more ornate than Philip’s. Those at the royal table were served by English courtiers.

In the hall, large buffets had been set up to display impressive gold and silver-gilt plate. Nearly one hundred and forty people dined on thirty dishes in four courses. These included the privy councilors and ambassadors at one table, and two long tables for the English and Spanish guests who all stood as they ate. At the other end of the hall, a dais was set up for the musicians who played during the entire meal.

At the appointed time, four heralds and a knight appeared. The knight gave a speech acclaiming the marriage and afterwards, Philip invited the English councilors to drink a toast. The meal finished about five in the evening and Mary drank a cup of wine to the health and honor of the guests. The entire party moved to another hall where the festivities continued until nine, including dancing and other merrymakings. Mary and Philip left the party early to have a small supper separately in private. Bishop Gardiner finally blessed the marriage bed and the king and queen retired.

Philip was up by seven the next morning and heard mass. After mass, the king transacted royal continental business. Mary followed tradition and remained in seclusion with her ladies for the entire day.

Further reading: “Mary I: England’s Catholic Queen” by John Edwards, “Bloody Mary” by Carolly Erickson, “The Myth of ‘Bloody Mary’” by Linda Porter, “Mary Tudor: Princess, Bastard, Queen” by Anna Whitelock

14 responses

  1. What an amazing ceremony! It’s so interesting that he was made King, and could potentially have seized so much power, but the marriage didn’t last. What did actually happen? Did Philip just go back to Spain and was the marriage ever annulled?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hi Jo, Mary was Philip’s second wife and he actually only spent a few months in England during the marriage. Mary I died in November of 1558 while Philip was in the Netherlands. He did go back to Spain and married again twice. His third wife was Elizabeth de Valois, the daughter of King Henri II of France and Catherine de’Medici. She died after nine years of marriage. His fourth wife was his own niece Anna of Austria, the daughter of his sister. This last marriage has a little bit of the “ew” factor but he was truly the happiest with her.

      Liked by 1 person

    • I liked your question & Ms. Abernethy’s answer (system seldom allows me to “like” anymore). I think there were a lot of caveats written into the marriage contract that would not allow Phillip too much real power. Had they managed to have a living heir, he might have been able to exert more influence.

      Years later, when William III and Mary II reigned, the provisions of joint sovereignty allowed William to rule alone after Mary’s death. However, William was himself a more distant contender to the throne, which might have eased Parliament’s objections. I might be comparing cheese to chalk to even bring W&M into this consideration.

      But I do know W&M’s contract was carefully constructed by Parliament to preserve the Church of England’s Protestantism. It was also instituted long after the two were married, so were not part of marriage provisions.

      I think Parliament’s power was more circumscribed in Mary I’s reign, but more influential than in Henry VIII’s. Much was done in Edward VI’s weak reign to bolster Parliament’s influence.

      Since there was no child for Mary I & Phillip, the amount of power he could have wielded is pretty much conjecture. But your question inspires a “What if?”
      speculation!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Thank you, Shaun! I wonder if Phillip himself was hoping to get around those caveats, or if he had hoped for an heir who would do it for him. That is a very interesting ‘what if’ situation!

        Liked by 1 person

    • It’s important to remember that Phillip married not out of love, but for dynastic advantage. I have no doubt there were mighty wranglings between Phillip’s council, Mary’s council, & Parliament so that no sneaky takeovers could occur.

      It was probably a blessing to Europe that no healthy heir came of the union. Being the father of a future English/Spanish monarch in those days of near-absolutism could have made Phillip one of the most powerful men in history. The what-ifs are staggering! Remember; Scotland was not yet part of the domain. Imagine Mary’s & Phillip’s child handling Mary Queen of Scots? It could have resulted in a catastrophic war with France, due to the Auld Alliance.

      Parliament & Mary had good reason not to give too much power to the King-who-was-not-quite-a-king!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Every detail was loaded with significance! Amazing how the rituals managed to cross every “t” & dot every “i” of protocol. Leave anything out & it could be a disaster to political stability!

    A king, and yet not the King! I bet that took some fancy wordsmithing!

    Well, I “like”! And I’d like to “like” some comments, but can’t. :-{

    Liked by 1 person

  3. In the double portrait, painted by a skillful artist (I recognize Mary’s face from another picture) Philip’s legs look awfully disproportionate. Did he suffer from a malformation?

    Like

  4. Interesting to me is that the documents were in both English and Latin and a commentary was given in both languages. Is this new—having translations?

    I wonder how long it took to plan the wedding and make sure everyone knew where they were supposed to be.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mimi Matthews

Mimi Matthews

Georgian Papers Programme

Uncovering the historical papers of the Georgian Royal Family

partylike1660.com/

Titillating tidbits from the court of the Sun King

The History Jar

English History from 1066

Fleeting Glimpse

.separated by time, not space.

Exploring London

A blog about London and its history...

From the Hands of Quacks

by Jaipreet Virdi

Jo Woolf

Writer in Residence at the Royal Scottish Geographical Society

Princess Charlotte of Wales

Don't treat it as history, just read it as a story.

%d bloggers like this: