The Scandal and Downfall of Piers Gaveston

Today The Freelance History Writer is pleased to present a guest article by Gareth Russell. Gareth is an historian and writer from Belfast, Northern Ireland. He studied Modern History at the University of Oxford and completed a postgraduate in medieval history at Queen’s University, Belfast. He is the author of two novels and three non-fiction books, including his most recent book, “A History of the English Monarchy: From Boadicea to Elizabeth I”. He is currently writing a biography of Queen Catherine Howard.

Depiction of King Edward II of England

Depiction of King Edward II of England

The Scandal and Downfall of Piers Gaveston at the Court of King Edward II of England

Anyone who has seen the 1995 movie Braveheart is likely to remember the pathetic and weak Prince Edward, a snivelling wretch whose lover is tossed out a window by his depraved father. The real Edward II could not have been less like his portrayal in one of the 1990s’ most successful flicks. He had a filthy sense of humour, an easy-going repartee with common people and a passion for manual labour. Like his father, Edward II was tall and robust. The “Vita Edwardi Secundi”, which was an account of the King’s life written by a clerk who lived at Edward’s court and who recorded his experiences at the time, observed that the King was ‘a fine figure of a handsome man’, while Sir Thomas Grey, whose father fought in Edward’s army, wrote that ‘physically he was one of the strongest men in the realm’. Another thought Edward moved well despite his size: ‘elegant, of outstanding strength’. None of the eyewitness descriptions of Edward’s contradicts one chronicler’s description of him as ‘fair of body and great of strength’. There are no surviving accounts that mention his eye colour, but illustrations and his effigy all show wavy blond hair that fell either to his chin or his shoulders. Later in life, he grew a beard.

The exact nature of Edward’s relationship with his favourite Piers Gaveston has divided scholars, with some cautioning against ‘anachronistic and futile’ attempts to impose modern concepts of sexuality on the medieval period. However, the contemporary accounts leave little room for reasonable doubt that it was a romantic relationship and quite probably a sexual one, as well. While it will always be impossible to verify how far they went sexually or how often, what mattered was that it was a love affair, the great love affair of Edward II’s life.

Piers Gaveston was the son of a Gascon knight, born a year or two before Edward II in 1284. He was barely a teenager when he joined his father in combat, where he apparently impressed King Edward I with his manners and skills as a soldier. Shortly after that, Edward I appointed him as one of ten young men to attend on the Prince of Wales to provide him with some suitable male company. Gaveston seems to have been the oldest of the ten and that, coupled with his good looks – one contemporary wrote that Gaveston was ‘graceful and agile in body, sharp witted, refined in manners […] well versed in military matters’ – his prowess as a jouster and the fact that he had already experienced the battlefield, perhaps explain young Edward’s initial infatuation with him.

Infatuation quickly turned into obsession. A clerk in Edward’s service wrote, ‘I do not remember to have heard that one man so loved another. Jonathan cherished David, Achilles loved Patroclus.’ Another chronicle wrote that after a short separation, Edward ran over to Piers ‘giving him kisses and repeated embraces; he was adored with a special familiarity’. In an age when embracing and kissing, even on the lips, was an accepted form of greeting within the upper classes, it was not so much Edward’s actions that caused offence as the effusiveness with which they were bestowed. In a ruthless and mercenary age, the Earl of Pembroke would later remark, ‘he perishes on the rocks that loves another man more than himself’. It was a lesson that Edward II never learned.

At a winter joust held shortly after Edward I’s funeral, Gaveston ‘very proud and haughty in bearing’ carried the day as the best man at the tilts. It was victory at the jousts that apparently helped turn some of the magnates, like the bested Earl of Surrey, against him. Insult was added to injury by the favour Edward II lavished upon him. Aristocratic jaws collectively hit the floor when Edward made Gaveston the new Earl of Cornwall, a title that had previously been held by the younger brothers of Henry III and Edward I. The other nobles at Edward’s court ‘looked down on Piers, because, as a foreigner and formerly a mere man at arms raised to such distinction and eminence, he was unmindful of his former rank’. Further anger came when Edward arranged for Piers to be married to his niece, Margaret de Clare, a more-than advantageous match for the son of a knight. In a world obsessed with rank and precedence, Gaveston constituted an offensive anomaly.

In 1308, Edward himself was married to his stepmother’s niece, Princess Isabella of France. As the daughter of two monarchs – her father ruled France and her mother was the queen of Navarre – Isabella was a great catch as well as the living seal on the Treaty of Montreuil between her husband and her father. Three months after his marriage, Parliament presented Edward with a petition that asked for Piers Gaveston to be banished and stripped of his title. Faced with united opposition from his peers and parliament, Edward had to acquiesce, but he did so begrudgingly and with minimal sincerity. In return for losing the earldom of Cornwall, Gaveston was appointed Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, a job he executed with great success. The state the island had been left in after Edward I’s dereliction of duty there meant that governing Ireland in the King’s name was a thankless task and Gaveston did not succeed in restoring royal authority to the levels it had enjoyed prior to the wars with Scotland. However, he was an effective and honest Lord Lieutenant who oversaw the fortification of vulnerable towns, avoided lining his own pockets, waged successful war in the Wicklow Mountains and, if he did not manage to retake the entire country, he at least solidified English control over the eastern province of Leinster.

In the summer of 1309, Gaveston was brought back to England. Two years later, Edward took him with him on campaign against Scotland. Here, Gaveston was far less successful. Edward II is often blamed for losing the Scottish Wars of Independence, but while he was an infinitely less talented general than his father it is unlikely that Edward I himself would have won those wars, even if he had lived longer.

In a climate of military failure and aristocratic unrest, Piers Gaveston was exiled for a third time, but hope tragically triumphed over experience as Edward brought him back two months later. This time, despite their happiness at being reunited, Edward and his favourite were aware of the net tightening around them. In the spring of 1312, they had to vacate Newcastle in a hurry when they were warned that there were forces moving against them. They fatefully chose to briefly separate. The King went to York, while Gaveston made for Scarborough Castle where he was surprised by his enemies. He surrendered on condition of safe conduct to York, where he would be allowed to join the King for another round of negotiations. Through accident or design, the guardians of his safe conduct failed. The Earl of Warwick managed to kidnap Gaveston from Deddington in Oxfordshire and brought him to Warwick Castle, where he was tried by a panel of his opponents and taken to nearby Blacklow Hill, where two Welsh soldiers had been instructed to run him through with their swords before hacking off his head and leaving the body where it fell. A passing group of Dominican friars recovered the corpse and his remains were eventually laid to rest at the priory of Kings Langley, a Dominican house that Edward had founded himself.

Steve Waddington as Edward in the movie adaptation of Christopher Marlowe’s play “Edward II”, which focused heavily on the downfall of Piers Gaveston

Edward II’s grief at Piers Gaveston’s death can only be imagined and there are signs, not least in the terrible hatred he bore towards his killers right up until his own deposition fifteen years later, that he never fully recovered from it. For a year after the murder, every Augustinian abbey in England and Ireland was ordered to say a daily Mass for the repose of Gaveston’s soul. Public sympathy was, at least initially, firmly on the King’s side. What the earls had done was astonishing and repulsive. Gaveston’s death looked more like a lynching than a lawful execution. Even some of the dead man’s former enemies, like the Earl of Surrey, were unhappy with what had occurred and Queen Isabella seems to have sided completely with her husband. Edward II did his duty by fathering four children with Queen Isabella who, as she grew older and became a mother, was given more of a say in her husband’s government. (It was only years later that their marriage fell apart with such devastating consequences.) The birth of an heir, another Edward, at Windsor Castle on 13 November 1312, five months after Gaveston’s death, was a personal triumph for Edward II. Four years later, the heir was followed by a younger brother, John, and two sisters, Eleanor and Joan, in 1318 and 1321.

The King briefly attempted to repair his relations with the nobility by resuming the war with Scotland, in the hopes that victory would paper-over the cracks shown by Gaveston’s demise. On 24 June 1314, near Stirling, he suffered a devastating defeat in the Battle of Bannockburn. Years later, when he began to pick off Gaveston’s killers and enemies, even as the policy of revenge served cold undercut his own political authority, it was clear that the legacy of Piers Gaveston remained a potent and defining one in Edward II’s reign.

55 responses

  1. Pingback: The Kings of England Who Never Were ~ A Guest Post by Michael Long « The Freelance History Writer

  2. Pingback: The Woes of Warwick Castle ~ A Guest Post by N.B. Dixon « The Freelance History Writer

  3. I have become so enamored with English history, beginning with The War of the Roses and particularly with all things Tudor. I have yet to explore much prior to these periods, but this article has definitely wettened my appetite to do so. I wish that there could be a time machine as well, so that I could travel back in time to see for myself how things truly unfolded. To place myself where I could meet some of the interesting people that we are still discussing today….I marvel at the possibilities. I wonder what Queen Isabella must have felt about her husband’s relationship with Piers Gaveston? Wouldn’t it be fantastic to see the coronation of Anne Boleyn? So many questions left to the imagination. Thank you for sparking an interest in more fascinating people who were also amidst the English throne and thanks once more for the opportunity to win the book.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I love the article, obviously well researched and full of historical fact, yet an easy and enjoyable read. Bodes well for a book which should be on the book shelves of anyone who loves history. Will Gareth Russell be doing a second volume from James I to Elizabeth II? I assume (hopefully correctly) that Mr Russell’s favourite period of history is still the medieval, but I would love to know who his favourite monarch or character is from that period.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Thank you for putting more flesh on the bones of this period in history, I found this information very enlightening and it has given a more balanced view of the character and personality of Edward II and of his relationship with Gaveston.

    Like

  6. If the other Earls were not so jealous of Piers Gaveston, it seems he was actually a credit to the monarchy. He was able to be a fair and effective governor of Ireland.Very informative post. Thank you for the giveaway an a chance to win a copy of the new book.

    Like

  7. Oh how, I wish a time machine existed so we can go back in time and see for ourselves the truth of things!
    And Catherine Howard is my favorite Tudor queen. I like to imagine I know what made Lady Rochford tick and I’d like to give Catherine a hard slap in the (a la Cher “snap out of it”) face to wake her and save her life!

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Fascinating article in keeping with the high standard of your site, Susan. Great to get this kind of insight into historical figures, insight that really fleshes out the character of the person ad addresses very well the historical and cinematical misconceptions. Thank you and Gareth.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Thank you, very much for the article and a chance to win the book. I have been reading your posts for a while now and I have always read them with great interest. I look forward to them.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. What a wonderful story. It has been many years since I read Thomas Costain’s Plantagenet series, one book featuring the “Edwards”. This is a more complete story of the Piers Gaveston episode. Thank you.

    Like

  11. Interesting read. Would enjoy reading more of Edward II and his reign. Winning this contest would be a bonus. Thanks for the opportunity to enter.

    Like

  12. Really interesting areticle to read another viewpoint, regarding Glaveston, this book will go on my wish list, thanks for the chance to win a copy of this

    Like

  13. I have assumed that much of the histories of earlier times was written not just by the winners [the demonizing of Richard III for example] but by the clergy as well. Many monarchs who were terrible to their subjects, even for the times they lived in, seem to get off lightly if they supported the institutions of the Church. Did Edward’s reputation suffer such a smear campaign because he antagonized the Church in some way or was it mostly because he lost his battle against his nobles?

    Like

  14. British Royal History has long been a fascination in my life – as soon as I can save the pennies, I’ll be ordering a copy of this!

    Like

  15. An excellent and interesting read. I was familiar with the ‘other side’ of the story, having read Marlowe’s play, “The Troublesome Raigne and Lamentable Death of Edward II” many years ago at University, and much more recently, Alison Weir’s biography of Isabella of France.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Georgian Papers Programme

Uncovering the historical papers of the Georgian Royal Family

Party Like 1660

Titillating tidbits from the court of the Sun King

The History Jar

English History from 1066

Fleeting Glimpse

.separated by time, not space.

Exploring London

A blog about London and its history...

From the Hands of Quacks

by Jaipreet Virdi-Dhesi

Explorers of the RSGS

The history, heritage and people of the Royal Scottish Geographical Society

Princess Charlotte of Wales

Don't treat it as history, just read it as a story.

ReginaJeffers's Blog

Every Woman Dreams...

http://www.theoryofirony.com

Just another WordPress.com site

First Night History

How can we improve our future if we don't understand the past?

%d bloggers like this: