Some Thoughts on History

King Louis XI of France surrounded by the Knights of the Order of St. Michael
King Louis XI of France surrounded by the Knights of the Order of St. Michael

It’s the start of a new year and I’ve been having some thoughts on history, what it means to me and what I’ve learned in the last two years. The Freelance History Writer blog was started about a year and a half ago and with all the learning I’ve done since then, I’ve had some revelations I’d like to share. These opinions are entirely my own.

History is not an exact science! Far from it. In some cases especially the farther back you go, the records are so scanty, it’s hard to know what is real and what isn’t. And every historian has their own interpretation of these records. You could have ten historians read a passage and you could get ten different ideas about what it means. No one is 100% right when it comes to history. When researching a post for the blog, I try to read as much about the records as I can and get one or more interpretations from other historians. I then make up my own mind about what it means.

History can change. Nothing is written in stone. There can be new discoveries or an examination of the old theories that make a new interpretation necessary. This is perfectly normal and natural. There can be archaeological finds that might change the records or confirm some interpretations. Just look at the discovery of the bones of King Richard III of England. Some records say he was a hunchback or deformed in some way. Well, the bones verified that he did have a curvature of the spine. Another example is portraits of people which many thought were one person but when the evidence is examined and other portraits compared, it turns out it might be someone else entirely. As historians, we must keep an open mind.

One thing I have learned a lot about is sources for writing about history. In this day and age there are so many sources available right at our fingertips. As long as you have a computer, you can usually find what you need. Personally, I always like to have books; real books that I can put my hands on. I’ve always been a great reader and I take great pleasure in reading a history book. And books have indexes that can help you find the information you need.

There are many books online as well as magazine articles and other blogs. I’ve had some really good luck with Google Books. You can put in a search term and if there is a book that has information on that subject, those pages will come up. This has saved me many times. Another good source is online databases. I recently signed up with my local public library and have found some good resources there. The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography has been very helpful and is available in the library of one of our local universities. Access to it is free. One nice thing about these databases and online articles is many times they have a list of sources at the end where you can explore a topic further.

Another pleasant discovery in doing all of this research is serendipity. Serendipity is the accidental discovery of something pleasant, valuable or useful. How many times have I found another interesting woman or fascinating battle or historical incident while doing research on another topic? This is a big part of what makes history and research fun for me. History is always fascinating. Thank you to all the loyal followers and readers for joining with me here at The Freelance History Writer.

24 thoughts on “Some Thoughts on History

  1. “What concerns us is not what historical facts at this or that time are, per se, but what they signify, what they point to….”. We are either fact-gatherers, or we are insightful, world-experienced men and women who have a genuine knack for recognizing significance in underlying events and endeavors. The fact-gatherer must be scrupulous and tidy; the interpreter on the other hand, must have that rare gift of the poet’s vision, which is to thoroughly differentiate from mere seeing.


  2. “And every historian has their own interpretation of these records.” — well, some arguments are more convincing than others….

    “No one is 100% right when it comes to history.” — yes, but again, some arguments are definitely more convincing than others…


    • Yes of course Joachim. There are some periods of history where there are copious sources and a historian is able to determine what happened. But there is always room for different interpretations and opinions.


      • There are no opinions, there are only well-supported arguments 😉

        Ahhh, but we’re not talking about little bits of things we know happened….

        We’re talking about interpreting these bits. History isn’t only determining what battle happened or what aunt got angry at her niece for marrying her beneath her stature. It’s figuring out why, and there the critical thinking skills so central to the historian’s craft determine whether an argument has more veracity than another.

        (I being a nitpick but my undergraduates think history is about what is right and what is wrong not which arguments are better than others — arguments made by trained historians)


      • Now I see where you are coming from Joachim. The week I wrote this post, I had a friend on a history Facebook page arguing about a portrait and who was in it. She was saying a source she used was 100% right like your students. It made me think about “well-supported arguments” and how they can change history. 😉


      • Yes, it’s not necessarily about how many sources there are — for example, more modern history (I’m a medievalist) is not “better” in anyway—but how they are used (context, genre, author, audience, etc).


    • Thank you Tina! It’s good to know there are others who have experience the same thoughts! Thanks for reading.


  3. Three cheers for the public libraries and on-line resources. I enjoyed my days in the grad stacks, but it’s a lot faster now. The downside though is a loss of the serendipitous discovery made on a “forgotten” shelf.


  4. Yes I agree Susan that everyone can see the same history but read it differently. That’s what makes it so interesting . Love this blog so much . Thank you


  5. I envy students of today. Earning BA over 40 years ago in history there was no internet. You hadda have the books and unless at premier university or large city the number of books on many subjects was very finite.


    • Yes Carl! I remember it well. I was a little luckier because I worked in the campus library at college in the reference section. I look back now and consider that experience to be very helpful in doing my research these days. Happy New Year to you.


  6. I do agree with you, Susan – this is what makes history so compelling! I also agree that there’s no substitute for a good book. I’m looking forward to more of your posts in 2014. A very Happy New Year to you!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.